The Establishment of Hitlers Dictatorship and Its...

The Establishment of Hitlers Dictatorship and Its Legality The career of Adolf Hitler was marked by a spectacular rise to power. He went from being a nobody in the streets of Vienna to the supreme leader of one of the most powerful nations on earth. Hitler came to power through a combination of legal means and backroom politics. The events leading up to the rise of the Nazis and Hitler are prime examples of the myriad of factors intertwining in the area of social action. Economists view the economic conditions as the major reason for the downfall of the Weimar republic and the rise of the Nazis but political scientists like to point out the constitutional structure of the Weimar constitution.†¦show more content†¦Polling 44 percent of the votes, the Nazis won 288 seats in the Reichstag. With the support of their conservative nationalist allies, who held 52 seats, the Nazis controlled a majority of the 647 member Reichstag. The Nazi majority was even more substantial, since none of the 81 Communist deputies were allowed to take th eir seats. The Enabling Act, March 1933 On March 23, 1933, the Reichstag passed the Enabling Act, which gave dictatorial authority to Hitlers cabinet for four years. Armed with full powers, Hitler moved to eliminate all possible centers of opposition. His policy is known as Gleichschaltung, which translates literally as coordination. In this context, however, it meant more precisely subordination, that is, subordinating all independent institutions to the authority of Hitler and the Nazi Party. It was the Enabling Act of March 23, 1933, which in a legal way conferred dictatorial powers on Adolf Hitler. Only 94 Social Democratic votes were cast against it. The date for its abrogation (see Article 5) was never kept. Indeed, the Enabling Act is the last measure which the Reichstag passed under the republican and democratic Constitution of the Republic. It spelled its end and the beginning of NationalShow MoreRelatedThe Regimes of Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler with Social and Political Modernization2061 Words   |  9 Pagesdiffering ideological perspectives and it is important not to lump the two together when discussing or comparing their regimes or policies as many historians have tended to do in the past. To begin with I will examine the Italian dictatorship of Benito Mussolini and assess the extent to which his Fascist regime achieved social and political modernization. It is interesting to note that at this present time many thinkers in Italy are asking whether one should be waryRead MoreThere is such a thing as universality of human rights that is different from cultural relativism,2200 Words   |  9 Pageswhen it came to international relations. Of course that all changed after the atrocities committed by the Nazi regime in the Holocaust were exposed to the global community. After what had happen to the Jewish population in Europe at the hands of Hitlers army was reviled to the world, the international community realized that there was something to the whole idea of human rights that could quite possibly go beyond the recognizable sovereignty of independent states(Collaway, Harrelson-Stephens, 2007Read MoreThe Rise and Rule of Single-Party States7795 Words   |  32 PagesQuestions will be set on major themes. Some of these will require knowledge of two regions. Major Themes * Origins of single-party states * conditions which produce single-party state. * emergence of leader: aims, ideology, support. * Establishment of single-party states * methods: force, legal * form of government, ideology (left and right wing) * totalitarianism, treatment of opposition * Rule of Single Party states * political, economic, and social policies * roleRead MoreTo What Extent Did the Nazis Establish a Volksgemeinschaft? Essay3244 Words   |  13 Pagespolicy. Consequently its establishment entailed various inconsistencies and contradictions. It did not totally engross the hearts and minds of Germanys Third Reich into a new system of nationalised beliefs and a new religious dimension that glorified the Fuhrer as cult. To be more precise, people generally accepted National Socialism as a more beneficent political way rather than zealously rejoiced in its ideology. The revival of the economy in conjunction with Hitlers diplomatic success contributed